we-rate-stuff.com
We Rate Stuff



Movies

July 25, 2008

Step Brothers

More articles by Kaitis »
Written by: Kaitis
Tags: ,
Step Brothers

All of the money in Judd Apatow’s pocket right now is from me. Since 2004 he’s produced 11 movies, all of which I’ve seen in theaters. That doesn’t even account for money I’ve thrown him for the DVDs I had to have, because of the funnier-than-the-movie extras. His latest flick, Step Brothers was just another movie to shell out some cash for. Will Ferrell and John C. (Christopher; anyone else ever wanted to know that?) Reilly are exactly what the the title entails – Step Brothers. Their parents meet and they’re forced to live with each other, but seeing as they’re still losers who live at home, hilarity ensues. But I know you’ve seen the trailer, so I’ll get to the film.

Seeing how this was Ferrell’s first movie not about sports in a while, it was refreshing to see him play a realistic person instead of a crazy athlete. He and Reilly have unbelievable screen chemistry, and parts of this movie are downright ridiculous. Especially because a lot of improvisation is done between the two. The pair hate each other in the beginning of the movie and this leads to plenty of last-resort fighting, even with a scene culminating in a battle of a bicycle wielded by Ferrell and bat by Reilly.

As intended this film is much filthier than previous works Anchorman and Talledega Nights, and one scene you probably see Will Ferrell’s “nut sack.” But if these factors aren’t of major importance, then you’re in luck. Even though Ferrell and Reilly are definitely the stars, the supporting cast is also very good. The father in the film is played by Richard Jenkins, whom Six Feet Under fans know as Nathaniel Fisher Sr., a fantastic actor that proves he can be as funny as the leads. Adam Scott plays Ferrell’s actual brother, who is much more successful than him, so well that you actually hate the guy for being a D-bag.

Step Brothers is easily as good as any other Apatow production, albeit not the best. The story is slow at times and the jokes can feel cheap, but there are plenty of parts that make up for it, and a Seth Rogen cameo makes the movie much more worthwhile. Make sure you stay for the credits, as it’s some of the best fighting I’ve seen since Mr. Steve Brule’s last tape. Great job, Judd; I’ll probably have to get the DVD for this one too.

5/7

About the Author

Kaitis
Michael Kaitis is one of three founders of We Rate Stuff and also talks about himself in the third person.




 
 

 
Footloose 2011

Footloose (2011)

This trend of pointlessly remaking movies was bad enough, but now they're starting to remake '80s movies. That's really bad. Maddie sat through the new remake of Footloose, yawning, and wrote this.
by Maddie
0

 
 
In Bruges Movie Review

In Bruges

In Bruges is a bit of an older film, dating back to 2008, but Maddie swears it's a classic. If you're a fan of black comedy and extreme violence, this is your kinda film. If not, hey, why not check it out anyway?
by Maddie
0

 
 
Drive Movie Review

Drive

Everyone welcome WRS's newest contributor, Maddie Winward! She lives in the wooded magic of Oregon and she saw Drive recently, which has been getting rave reviews. Read on to find out what she thought of it.
by Maddie
2

 

 
50/50 Movie Review

50/50

Lots of people probably think 50/50 is just another Seth Rogen movie of slipping quality, but it's actually based on his relationship of Will Reiser when they wrote for Da Ali G Show. Kaitis has the details inside.
by Kaitis
0

 
 
Sympathy for Delicious DVD Review

Sympathy for Delicious DVD

If you can name one other film that includes both DJs and faith healing, you win. Because those two don't tend to go together. But Mark Ruffalo and Christopher Thornton seem to think they do, in Ruffalo's directorial debut.
by Marco
0

 




0 Comments


Be the first to comment!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>